Pages

Thursday, 10 January 2013

REVIEW: Parental Guidance

Ah, the family unit. The ridicule of all family films since the birth of film. Unwanted relatives in Uncle Buck, the forgetful parents in Home Alone and then the divorced parents in Mrs Doubtfire. It's all there and it feels like it's all been done before.

However, along comes Parental Guidance, a film that decides to poke fun at the idea that parents have become soft. They worry too much about their children's feelings and forget to actually discipline and parent their children.

The film follows controlling parents, Alice (Marisa Tomei) and Phil Simmons (Tom Everett Scott) who have three children; the talented musician, Harper (Bailee Madison), the son with a speech impediment, Turner (Joshua Rush) and the weird youngest boy, Barker (Kyle Harrison Breitkopf). While Alice and Phil are extremely busy with their work lives, they still manage to just about squeeze in time to parent their three children. However, when Phil suggests that they go on a private holiday and leave the children in the care of grandparents, Dianne (Bette Midler) and Artie Decker (Billy Crystal), Alice has problems letting go of the reigns of control. What follows is a "crazy" and somewhat touching journey of discovery where the children learn that they can have fun and that Alice actually has to let go a little bit in order to become a 'better Mom'.

While Parental Guidance tries to find some new ground in the well worn family comedy sub-genre, it still fails to feel fresh. To be quite frank, the 'U' certificate that the film has plumped for ('U' standing for Universal, which means suitable for all) has arguably ended up harming the film. I say this, because a good family film should have the gross-out gags for the children, but also the subtle innuendos to entertain the parents - with a 'U' certificate, Parental Guidance arguably fails to entertain the elders by completely bypassing the subtle adult humour and hitting crude sight gags head on.

As a result, the set-up to the film at the beginning is a bit of a mess. The most jarring thing at the beginning is that characters do not feel properly set-up - the only characters with a true sense of any kind of problem are the children. Parents Alice and Phil just don't seem to be truely "modern" parents who care too much about their children's feelings more than disciplining them - they have stock phrases like, "Use your words!" instead of saying, "No!" to their children, but other than that there is no sense that these parents are stiff and uptight. It almost felt like their characters should be extreme in order for more comedy and to make their character arc more defined. Likewise, the Grandparents are supposed to be these weird, kooky relatives that you want to hide away, until you have to talk to them. To be frank, Dianne and Artie Decker seemed like really nice people and the kind of Grandma and Grandad that you really wouldn't mind having to visit. As such, when Alice has such a hard time agreeing to let them look after their children, it felt forced.


However, where Parental Guidance gets it right is that the film has heart. Much like Home Alone and Mrs Doubtfire, which have a heartfelt message to tell, Parental Guidance gets its schmaltzy family-values message across in it's third act - largely thanks to the children characters. We see the strange Barker finally let go of his imaginary friend in a poignant funeral for him in the back garden. Then there's Turner who overcomes his speech impediment thanks to Artie's obsession with commentating on Baseball. Then finally, there's Harper who is finally allowed to be a young girl, make friends and actually stay at her new school (rather than moving around all the time.) It's the scene between Mother and Daughter at the end, when Alice finally let's go of the reigns and allows Harper to step down from her musical school audition (so she can stay at her regular High School where she is finally making friends) that really steals the show - for a film that largely relied on messy sight gags, it was a welcome release of emotion at the end.

So, if you're going into Parental Guidance expecting the next big Mrs Doubtfire family film, then you will be sadly disappointed. It's a bit of a mess of a film that finally starts to get it right round about the mid-way point. However, the messy start and complete ignorance of it's older audience that sadly lets the film down greatly.

**/*****


REVIEW: The Impossible

There's nothing like a film based on a true story is there? We're amazed by the human nature on-screen and the impossible problems that they face (see what I did there?!) but then at the end of it, we realise that this actually did happen.

The 2004 tsunami was an event which swamped the media and has actually featured in some films since (Hereafter) but The Impossible feels like the first proper effort to bring the true story to the silver screen.

The film follows parents Maria (Naomi Watts) and Henry (Ewan McGregor) who bring their three sons, eldest Lucas (Tom Holland) and younger siblings Simon (Oaklee Pendergast) and Thomas (Samuel Joslin) to Thailand for a Christmas break. However, as we all know, tragedy struck in the form of a tsunami on Boxing Day, sending the whole area into disarray and mayhem. Maria and Lucas are separated from the rest of their family and must find their way to help across the terror that now lies before them. Along the way they pick up a young boy to help him, but Lucas' worries are focused on Maria, who has a horrible gaping wound on the back of her leg, which is resulting in huge blood loss. With the help of the local indigenous people, Maria and Lucas make their way to a local hospital, where Lucas finds his calling in helping to reunite others (while looking for his Dad and brothers at the same time.) As Maria's condition worsens, to the point where she is on the edge of death, it's a case of a race against the clock for Lucas to find the rest of his family before he is left on his own in the devastated country.

OK, so The Impossible is an unashamedly weepy film, which is purely designed to tug at our heart strings and really make us empathise with the family and the situation that they are in. It wastes no time in getting the tsunami wave on screen and place our protagonists in mortal danger, so the majority of the film has time to play with putting them in perilous situations which we are willing them to survive. One of the first times that I really felt the film was doing this was after the tsunami had struck, Maria and Lucas were clinging onto a fallen tree for dear life, and they both admitted to each other that they were scared. Surely not a thing that a Mother would do for her son? But the emotions were so raw at this moment, that it just felt so real. At this point, I knew the casting and the acting from our main players was going to be spot on.

I cannot really praise the young Tom Holland enough, who really does carry his and Watt's story, as Maria quickly falls into a catatonic state, where her injuries are so overwhelming that she is barely able to speak. He goes from a heartless, moody brother (he won't even talk to his little bro on the plane... ahhh diddums!) to the point where he is actively seeking out people's missing relatives in the dank Thai hospital simply so they can be reunited. It's a brilliant character arc that Holland manages to pull off brilliantly. While Pendergast and Joslin were also fairly good in their roles as the younger brothers, they were simply there to look cute most of the time. The only weak link in the family that I could really pinpoint is the casting of McGregor. While he wasn't weak in portraying his character, his desperation to find his wife and child is heart wrenching, some of his decisions that he makes are simply dumb and made me dislike his character at some points. I mean, who would send off his two young sons on a van with strangers, simply so he can search for his wife and elder son alone?

I guess what I'm trying to say is I wish the film would have spent much more time with Maria and Lucas and kept the rest of the family as a sub-plot, as I felt much more invested with their story.



However, the direction from Spanish Director, Juan Antonio Bayona is pretty much spot on as he hits most story beats and wrings all the emotional scenes for all that he can. However, strangely enough, his decision to include the visceral details of Maria's leg wound and the disgusting environment of the overwhelmed Thai hospital saps out the emotional edge of the film but adds to the realism. I could tell this was happening as three young teenage girls who sat directly behind me, obviously there for a good cry, were debating whether to leave or not because the film was so 'disgusting' (much to the annoyance of everyone else around them.) While I don't think it harmed the film in any way at all, some people may feel a little bit cheated, because the trailer promises a good weepy epic and decides to bypass all the medical struggles that are faced in the film.

However, that is the only blip that I could find in the film, because The Impossible is a brilliantly raw take on the 2004 disaster that struck the coast of Thailand. While it may not be as sad and depressing as such weepy favourites as The Notebook, The Impossible is more about the family ties and bonds and how far people will go in the face of adversity to find the ones that they love. The tsunami itself isn't lingered upon in numerous sweeping aerial shots or with a massive build-up, it just hits the audience as suddenly as the real thing hit the coast of Thailand.

So, go into The Impossible expecting a raw and emotional take on the 2004 tsunami then you won't be disappointed. Expect to go in with a handful of tissues and a good old cry, and you might be disappointed. Sure, it's a sad film and certain scenes really did get a lump in my throat, but it isn't a weepy classic.

****/*****


Thursday, 3 January 2013

2013: A Year to Look Forward To...

Much like last year, I'm going to predict which films I am most looking forward to (and also those which I'm not really bothered about.) I didn't do too badly last year...

FILMS I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO WILL BE IN GREEN!
FILMS I COULD LIVE WITHOUT WILL BE IN RED!


January

Texas Chainsaw 3D
OK, so I'm a horror junkie. While I admit this film doesn't really look good or much like the original 1974 Texas Chain Saw Massacre - it looks like a generic modern day horror film - I can still get a little bit excited about a mainstream horror release. Right?

The Last Stand
Arnie back in an all guns blazing action film? Count me in! I just hope that he hasn't tried to play it all cool and has kept in his cheesy one-liners.

V/H/S
Another horror film, and what?! This one was released in America last year, so us Brits are a bit behind the times. It does seem that this one includes found-footage which I'm not a massive fan of (it feels a bit of a lazy option for filmmakers), the fact that this is a collaborate effort between different genre directors is quite exciting.

A Haunted House
Just looks really boring and not very funny, considering this is supposed to be a comedy. When will spoof filmmakers realise that Scary Movie was funny because they took their time with writing it and they didn't try to cram in extreme amounts of popular culture references that get old really quickly?! (Thankfully, I can't find a UK release date for this one yet!)


February

A Good Day to Die Hard
While the title of the film is a bit of a mouthful, the fifth entry into the Die Hard franchise doesn't look too bad. I'll admit it, I pretty much loved Die Hard 4.0 with it's digital age self, but I'm not sure what A Good Day to Die Hard can bring new to the table with it's storytelling... At this stage, what really can the son/father relationship do differently that Die Hard 4.0 didn't do with the bickering duo?!

Mama
This Guillermo del Toro produced horror film looks very interesting and very creepy. I've always been fascinated by the idea of feral children who've had a deprived upbringing and this film brings that to the forefront of horror. What if their Mama didn't really want to let go?!

Dark Skies
Looks like a more subdued and interesting take on the alien abduction sub-genre of sic-fi. I'm in.

Hansel & Gretal Witch Hunters
This just looks like Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter on steroids, which isn't really a good thing. How can you take such a classic Grimm fairytale and make it look so shallow and boring?

March

Oz: The Great and Powerful
While the film does look a little bit of a visual feast, I'm still a bit unsure as to what the depth to the story could be. However, I'm a fan of James Franco, so I'm happy.

Jack The Giant Slayer
I felt like I've been seeing snippets of this film for ages, so I'm excited that the release date is actually looming soon.

The Last Exorcism Part II
The first film left a sour taste in the mouth when it ended so abruptly that it felt like the filmmakers ran out of ideas. I have a feeling that I will have the same feeling with this one.

GI Joe: Retaliation
The fact that this film was pushed back a whole year because the test audiences disliked it so much might be a testament to how bad this film is. And the fact that I didn't really like the first one either...


April

Jurassic Park 3D
OK, call me a hypocrite because I wasn't looking forward to Titanic's 3D re-release last year, but Jurassic Park is different because it's a childhood classic. I don't know if the 3D will be any good, but I'll still love the film!

Evil Dead
This film looks completely brutal. While I liked the first film, the 80s charm really makes it, it seems like this remake is really pushing the boundaries of horror. I mean, look at the trailer...

Iron Man 3
While Iron Man 2 was a bit lacklustre, I'm hoping that the most charming of The Avengers crew can bounce back with a better sequel this time. I have hope for this one.

Scary Movie 5
Yep, they're making another one. And yep, it looks just as bad as all the other "Movie" spoofs out there.

May

Star Trek Into Darkness
I'm not a Trekkie, but I loved JJ Abrams Star Trek back in 2009 with all his screen-glare-glory and this sequel looks just as incredible!

The Hangover Part III
I loved The Hangover, but The Hangover Part II was simply a terrible retread of the same story and even the same story beats as the first film. Thus, I'm not really bothered about The Hangover Part III.


June

Man of Steel
Now that The Dark Knight trilogy is over, Christopher Nolan has turned his Producing duties towards bringing back Superman to our screens in what appears to be a darker and much grittier version. I can't wait.

World War Z
While this looks nothing like the book and that the zombies look a bit of a strange CGI mess (I'm hoping that they aren't as bad as the monsters in I Am Legend), I'm still looking forward to this for the sheer scale of destruction shown in the trailer.

Monsters University
Wait, another unwarranted Disney sequel?! Never.

July

Pacific Rim
I don't know too much about this one, but the trailer looks incredible. I'm in.

The Smurfs 2
Did anyone ask for this? Really?!

August

300: Rise of an Empire
Not seen much about this one at all (I don't even have a trailer) but I, like every other man out there, absolutely loved 300 so let's just hope that this can live up to expectations.

This Is The End
An interesting one this. An end of the world comedy coming out in 2013. A bit late to jump on the bandwagon isn't it?!


Insidious Chapter 2
I kind of liked Insidious. It did well building up the creeps up until the stupid finale involving Darth Maul in the nether regions or whatever it was. Therefor, I don't want anymore in a sequel!

September

Elysium
Again, I've not heard too much about this, but the online viral marketing for this film is interesting. Also, it's written and directed by the bloke who did District 9, which I also loved so let's hope he keeps it up!

October

Carrie
Another horror remake, but much like The Evil Dead this one looks like it will equal or maybe even top the original 1970s film. Plus, this one has Chloe Grace Moretz in it, who I think is an amazing actress, who has Julianne Moore playing her Mother - what can go wrong?!

Thor: The Dark World
I loved the original Thor. To be honest, I thought I wouldn't because the trailer made it look a bit lame - the old fantasy character stuck in our world. But the film was just so cheesy and captivating and fun. I hope the sequel is more of the same... but different, as all sequels should be!

Paranormal Activity 5
It's getting silly now. I kind of liked the first one and the third one, but parts two and four were so ridiculously bad that the story is really starting to wear thin now.

November

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire
I haven't read the books, so I'm not sure if they are much better, but the films feel really watered down and censored considering that it follows young adults hunting and friggin' killing each other!

December

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
I'm currently reading The Hobbit at the moment and I literally cannot wait to see what Peter Jackson does with this one. The book is fairly short to be split into three films, so I want to see what Jackson adds to them.

Anchorman: The Legend Continues
I don't care how many people tell me otherwise, Anchorman was not funny. It was stupid and boring and I couldn't be less excited for a sequel.

REVIEW: Life of Pi

Some Directors simply take the job that's given to them. Some like to think they have a choice and select jobs that they like the look of. And then there is the rare breed that like to be called auteurs.

Like him or not, Ang Lee can be said to be an auteur of some kind. The Taiwanese Director has long since established his visually driven storytelling through such films as Hulk and Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, and it's safe to say that Life of Pi is no different, really.

Life of Pi follows the older Pi Patel (Irrfan Khan) who is retelling the story of when he survived the sinking of a cargo ship when he and his family were moving to Canada to a writer (Rafe Spall). While his early life is quickly skimmed over (largely showing us his love for India, a young girl who he has fallen in love with and a tiger who he has a fascination with called Richard Parker. It is then that we follow the teenager Pi Patel (Suraj Sharma) who is the lone survivor on a lifeboat with an injured zebra, a monkey, a hyena and Richard Parker. Safe to say, the survivors on the boat are quickly whittled down and Pi is left to share his only chance of survival with the aggressive Richard Parker. It's a story of faith and belief as Pi tells a story that is difficult to believe, especially when he stumbles across a carnivorous island in the shape of a Hindu diety, Vishnu. Pi challenges the writer to believe in him and have faith that his story is true, or whether he wants to accept the more straight-forward and believable story where something much more straight-forward happened.

Life of Pi, while heavily reliant on the original source material, has Ang Lee written all over it. The film is visually stunning to look at, although I was confused as to why Lee chose to film it in 1.33:1 aspect ratio, rather than a wider screen. There's some beautiful aerial shots of Pi and Richard Parker as they lie in the lifeboat in the middle of the still ocean. There's some beautiful night shots, where the edge of the ocean and the start of the starry night merge together to form as one. And the boat sinking itself was also brilliantly tense as Pi desperately climbed and swam his way to safety, while backdropped against the brightly lit ship under the water. It's some really beautiful stuff.

And then, Ang Lee decides to cross the line of visually stunning storytelling, into a fantasy, whimsical dream like state when Pi and Richard Parker start to become some starved and drained and especially when they come across the carnivorous island. I know the whole film is about belief and getting the audience to have faith that Pi's story is the truth, but it almost felt like it was too much. I didn't want to have a repeat of Hulk where the visuals took over the storytelling and resulted in a boring story, I wanted to have a visually stunning story being told. It's just a shame that it seems Lee let's himself get too lost in the metaphor behind the story rather than actually telling the story.


Having said that, the most intense and interesting part of the film definitely comes within the first hour, where we learn of the young Pi's obsession with taming Richard Parker, the sinking of the cargo ship and then the initial struggle for dominance on the lifeboat between Pi and Richard Parker. It's just a shame that the second half starts to run out of steam - the carnivorous island sub-plot feels very rushed, yet it should have been a major plot point in establishing that when a person gives up hope, that's when they die (as seen when Pi tells the story of another man who gave up hope and was consumed by the island.) Also, when Pi needs to start telling the Chinese insurance company a more 'believable' story, again it feels very rushed and largely skipped over, when it was a story that relied on a lack of faith and should of had equal emphasis as the story with the animals and carnivorous island that required faith (almost as if to give them an equal balance.)

The way in which Life of Pi is told was always going to be the major hook to the story. It's like The Hole, where Thora Birch's character is left telling three different variations of the same story and leaves the audience wondering which is the truth. It's just a shame that we never truly get that sense of doubt in Life of Pi. The story which relies on faith, belief and religion is so shoved down our throats, that I felt it was quite preachy.

On another note, I have no idea why Ang Lee decided to agree to the dilm being in 3D. It literally added nothing to the storytelling. Unless my eyes were doubting me, there was no depth added. The stuff that "flew" out of the screen felt a little bit gimmicky and also quite flat (Li of Pi committed the same sin as Wrath of the Titans and suddenly shifted the aspect ratio of the film so stuff could "fly out" over the black screen space.) I almost felt like the 3D glasses were dimming the visuals on screen, so for the first time I felt that the 3D was a detriment to the film, rather than helping the storytelling.

So, overall Life of Pi is a bit of a mixed bag. While the story started off strong with the establishing of Pi's character and the predicament he faces when stranded on a lifeboat with a ferocious tiger, it fell completely flat in the second half when the visual-vomit from Ang Lee flew across the screen and the idea of faith was shoved down our throats.

**/*****


Tuesday, 1 January 2013

2012: A Year To Look Back On...

OK, so 2012 was when I first starting blogging my film reviews of everything that I saw at the cinema (and sometimes what I saw on DVD.) One of the first blogs of 2012 I did was what films I was looking forward to seeing and likewise, those that I wasn't looking forward to seeing. Let's have a look and see if I was right to be excited?



The Amazing Spiderman - ***/*****


As I said in the original blog post, I was a massive fan of Sam Raimi's Spiderman trilogy, so I was naturally looking forward to The Amazing Spiderman. While Andrew Garfield did a stand-up job taking over the red and blue suit and Emma Stone was great as his love interest, Gwen Stacey, the whole film felt a little boring and been-there-done-that. Basically, it wasn't that much different to the Raimi films.



Prometheus - ****/*****



I loved Prometheus. I don't care what you all think, I absolutely loved it. Sure, it wasn't a great prequel to Alien, and the stupid tacked on ending of the alien being born bugged me, but I loved how it raised so many questions. So what if it didn't answer all of them, it was a beautiful, beautiful film.



The Woman in Black - ****/*****



I loved the stage play. I then read the book and thought it was very chilling. The film? It was a bit reliant on heavy jump scares and sure, Daniel Radcliffe looked a little young to be playing Arthur Kipps, but it just felt like a well made tight little British horror film, something we have been missing since Hammer's heydays (minus the campiness of Christopher Lee).



Wrath of the Titans - ***½/*****



Clash of the Titans was pretty tame, had too much Hollywood gloss to it and had really flat 3D, but I was entertained on the most basic level. I was expecting more of the same from Wrath of the Titans, even though it had a new director, and I was unfortunately spot on. It suffered the same flaws in its look and plot, with even more monsters being abruptly killed off in this one. Looking back on it, I think my 3½ star writing might be a bit generous.



The Cabin in the Woods - ****/*****



I loved Cabin in the Woods. It was just what the horror genre needed to give it a bit of a boost - much like what Scream did in the 1990s. I'm just a little disappointed looking back on it that the film didn't get the mainstream advertising that it deserved. I can even overlook that ridiculous closing scene...



The Hunger Games - ***/*****



I don't like to admit it, but I was right with this one. It's a film that should have been a more extreme version than what it was. I don't understand why the filmmakers went for a light film which dealt with young people hunting and killing each other?!



The Avengers Assemble - **½/*****



One of my biggest disappointments of the year. I love superhero films and a film which had some of the big titans altogether should have been great. Instead, the 3D was flat and it just felt like it was the Thor show rather than a joint effort.



And films I wasn't looking so forward to...

American Pie: Reunion - ***/*****



I don't know how it did it, but American Pie: Reunion wasn't terrible. Sure, it wasn't an amazing feat of cinema, but it also didn't pretend to be anything else. Instead of finding the older actors weird and creepy doing the same stuff they did over 10 years ago, I felt a weird sense of nostalgia and remembering when I went to the cinema for the first films.



The Dictator - ½/*****



I was right - it was terrible. Sasha Baron Cohen needs to move on from his brand of "outrageous" humour, because it's not funny.



Titanic 3D - N/A



It was... nice to see this film in cinemas again and felt a lot more epic than watching it on the small screen. The 3D wasn't too shabby either, but not the best film of 2012 (or even 1997).



The Expendables 2 - ***/*****



I actually enjoyed The Expendables 2 a lot more than I thought I would. Even though Nan Yu nearly brought down the entire film with her appalling attempt at acting, it was great to see so many cameos by actions biggest stars.



Now on to 2013!

REVIEW: Pitch Perfect

Glee has a lot to answer for.

Not only does it ruin countless songs from popular culture by having 30-somethings sing them acting as teenagers and then having their voices auto-tuned to death but it has also restored the faith that tired high-school clichés and characters are back in.

Fortunately, Pitch Perfect shares very little with Glee, despite the obvious connection that they are both about singing groups.

Pitch Perfect follows Beca (Anna Kendrick) who is starting at Barden University, but doesn't really want to be there because she is being forced into a College education by her Father, Dr. Mitchell (John Benjamin Hickley). She starts working at the College radio station with Jesse (Skylar Astin), but her Father still doesn't approve because he wants her to join a proper College group so she can really feel what College is all about and make new friends. So, she joins the Barden Bellas, led by Aubrey (Anna Camp) and her right-hand woman, Chloe (Brittani Snow), who are trying to get the Bellas back to their former glory after a disastrous attempt at the a cappella finals last year. Unfortunately for them, they end up having to recruit a bunch of misfits in the form of Beca, slutty Stacie (Alexis Knapp), urban Cynthia Rose (Ester Dean), deathly quiet Lilly (Hana Mae Lee) and the fat Fat Amy (Rebel Wilson). Beca soon spots their shortfalls - they keep performing the same old tired routine - but Aubrey is so power hungry that she doesn't want to listen to anyone else's input. It's a case of falling out and making up again as the Barden Bellas make their way to the a cappella finals and try to win the 1st place title again. Will they make it? Who knows... well, that would be a lie.

The film itself feels like it's been dragged kicking and screaming out of the 1990s from films like Bring It On, The Waterboy and any other sports team/College group who are seen as underdogs and work their way to victory. In fact, in Pitch Perfect's defence, it never strays away from the tight cliché story that it follows and uses it to it's advantage most of the time in the sense that we know where the story is going, so we re here for the comedy and to laugh.

However, I have to get this out the way from the beginning; Pitch Perfect would be a very mediocre film at best and probably quite tame if it wasn't for Rebel Wilson and her character of Fat Amy. She literally steals every single scene that she is in and provides 90% of the laughs and punchlines in the film. The fact that the film has to rely on a character so much would be a little bit tiresome, but I personally find Rebel Wilson hilarious, so I didn't mind so much. But a word of warning, if you didn't like her style of comedy in Bridesmaids or What To Expect When You're Expecting (the little roles that she did have in them), then Pitch Perfect is like an extended version of those roles that she's already played - a socially awkward fat girl who says exactly what she is thinking.


But Pitch Perfect isn't all about Fat Amy, it's actually about Beca and her budding relationship with Jesse who has joined the rival all-male a cappella group, The Treblemakers lead by the 'douchebag' Bumper (Adam DeVine). However, because inter-a cappella group relations are not allowed and the fact that Beca is a moody little teenage girl full of angst, it doesn't make Jesse's advances to her very easy. Having said all that, despite the tension that is built that blocks their budding relationship, it's hardly Romeo and Juliet. I didn't really feel like I wanted them to get together and the kiss at the end felt a little bit forced. I guess I just wanted the scriptwriter, Kay Cannon to do something a bit more that would have really thrown their budding relationship into jeopardy. For example, the radio DJ shows some initial interest in Beca when he starts playing her mash-up remixes on the radio station, but that goes no where. Beca is explicitly told by Aubrey that relationships are not allowed in-between a cappella groups (and Beca needs to make The Barden Bellas work, because her Father has promised her funding to move to New York to become a Radio DJ if she does well at College) but Beca just invites Jesse around to her dorm room with no problems. It just felt a little bit... tame.

Secondly, the road to the finals seems a little bit easy for The Barden Bellas. I know the plot of this film was never going to be the reason to see it and that it's all down to the singing/comedy (depending on your preference), but there was prime opportunity to add more into it. Like when the Bellas' coach breaks down (due to Fat Amy not actually putting any petrol in it) there could have been a comedic struggle for them to actually get to finals. Instead, what do we get? A quick phone call to The Treblemakers and boom... they are back on the road again. The theatrical trailer also hinted at a bikini car wash to raise money, but it was mysteriously absent from the film. Who wouldn't have wanted to see Fat Amy in a bikini...? OK then.

And for those of you who have came for the singing? Well, for a film that runs on for about two hours, there really didn't feel like there was that much "organised nerd singing" and when it is there, it's auto-tund to hell and back (like on Glee). It's alright for people who aren't really into Glee or that type of singing - put it this way, characters suddenly don't burst into song when they are in trouble/annoyed/happy. The only singing comes when they are in their practice room or performing for the regionals. But the whole film is pitched as an a cappella singing comedy film, so the lack of singing in the two hour running time felt odd.

So, while Pitch Perfect isn't perfect, it certainly packs a few punches, courtesy of Fat Amy aka. Rebel Wilson. For those of you who were expecting a Glee film with different characters, it's almost there, but not quite - thank goodness! For those of you who aren't really into your singing teenage dramas, Pitch Perfect does feel a it cheesy in parts, but luckily there's not too much singing to turn you off.

*** / *****


REVIEW: Jack Reacher

Ah, another book series that has been snapped up by Hollywood. If I've said it once, I'll say it again - a book series, if successful can equal big monies for Hollywood. That's why they can be such hot property.

Now I must admit, I'm not too familiar with the Jack Reacher books (I guess I need to do some more reading!) So I'm going into this film blind to it's source material, which hopefully means I might be able to appreciate the filmmaking?!

Jack Reacher opens with a brutal and methodical sniper attack on five seemingly innocent civilians. The sniper, Barr (Joseph Sikora) is quickly apprehended by the Police and taken into custody. It is here that Barr simply says, "Get Jack Reacher." Reacher (Tom Cruise) is a military man who has decided to keep himself on the down low after his military service and almost take himself off the radar. He soon joins Helen (Rosamund Pike), Barr's Attorney who is convinced that he is innocent and wants to bring justice to the innocent victims. It's a tough line to walk though, as Helen soon starts to insult the victims' families and her father, Rodin (Richard Jenkins) is soon telling her that she needs to step down and just let Barr take the rap for what he's seemingly done. Meanwhile, Reacher is on the run from Emerson (David Oyelowo) and the rest of the Police force as they think that he is involved with even more murders taking place. However, the web of deceit is soon looking very tangled as Reacher and Helen soon realise that someone who is on their side is actually on the enemy's side.

To give it credit, Jack Reacher is a film that is fully developed into it's own tight-knit thriller that never really lets it's pace slow down and doesn't feel part of a 'larger picture' where the film studio and/or Director (Christopher McQuarrie) have held stuff back for the sequel. Sure, the character of Jack Reacher is quite mysterious and we don't learn too much about him, but I think it just adds to his mystery because he was someone who chose to take himself off the map and live a quiet life. It would have been a lot of heavy exposition if we were to learn his entire backstory.

However, on the other hand, while Jack Reacher is a mysterious character, Helen feels underdeveloped and completely overacted by Rosamund Pike. While I feel like I should be bigging-up a British actress who is making it 'big' across the pond, I couldn't get past her hammy facial expressions she was pulling when she was supposed to be shocked or her big wide-eyed face she kept pulling. It's a shame, because obviously there was supposed to be some kind of sexual tension between her and Jack Reacher, but it was just completely lost with Pike's B-movie acting.


It's funny, because when I first saw the trailer for Jack Reacher, I immediately thought this was going to be a film inspired by the excellent Drive, when in fact the two films have very little in common. To be honest, Jack Reacher is actually more like the recent dud, Alex Cross, but the two films couldn't be anymore different in how they were executed. While Alex Cross felt more like a cheap TV production with lots of slow down-time, Jack Reacher had well-timed action, a compelling crime conspiracy plot and some well executed comedy (keep an eye out for the scene where Reacher is searching the house of one of the suspects and he has to dispatch of two or three henchmen.)

But enough of the comparisons, because in all fairness Jack Reacher shouldn't be compared to an inferior film. While on the whole it is well-paced, the two hour plus run-time did feel a little bit excessive at times. I think the main problems with that came with the third act battle when Reacher needs to save Helen from the clutches of the evil villain, The Zec (Werner Herzog) who was the mastermind behind the whole sniper plot. There's a twist which is quite obvious from the start that was drawn out for a very long time and then a final fight scene between Reacher and one of Zec's right-hand men, Charlie (Jai Courtney) which felt a little underwhelming.

Even though Jack Reacher has it's flaws, it is definitely one of the better crime thrillers of the year. I can't wait for any further Reacher adaptations that needs to have Tom Cruise back and the 'bigger, faster, bloodier' mindset of many sequels.

****/*****